🔗 Share this article

The nation's bold move to prohibit social networking access for those under 16 is creating waves worldwide. Officials, safety advocates, and parents are monitoring intently to see if this strategy will inspire imitation for the rest of the world.

The European Trend

In Europe, a rising number of states are exploring parallel restrictions.

• Denmark has announced a ban on social media for youth below 15, with the PM stating that phones and apps are "robbing our kids' innocence". Legislation is expected to be enacted soon.
• The Norwegian government is set to enforce a access barrier of 15, citing the need to safeguard children from the "influence of the algorithms".
• Ireland is working on a digital wallet to verify the age and identity of social media users. The media minister have suggested that an similar ban could be "one of the measures on the table".
• In The Spanish government, the prime minister has called on the legislature to pass a proposal raising the minimum age for accessing social media to 16.
• In France, the president has floated the idea of a ban for under-15s, and a government panel has suggested a comparable step, alongside an overnight "internet blackout" for older teenagers.
• The authorities in The Dutch government has advised parents to restrict their youngsters from social media until 15.

For the broader EU, the bloc's legislature has passed a advisory statement demanding a ban for minors unless guardian approval is provided. While it warns of the "addictive" design of these apps, the step does not enact mandatory rules.

"An effective age barrier is a solid foundation," commented a leading MEP driving the measure.

The UK: A Cautious Stance

Across Britain, the government has kept open a future ban, stating that "nothing is off the table" but insisting any action must be "grounded in conclusive evidence".

Last year, interest gathered behind a bill to enact limits on social media use by minors, but it was eventually watered down. Nonetheless, the administration vowed to conduct more studies the issue.

Charities have voiced concerns. A prominent charity set up by the loved ones of a young person who was lost after encountering disturbing platform posts argues that a simple age ban may not improve online safety and could result in a "sudden drop-off" of harm when young people reach the legal age.

"The Australian ban is a answer to the refusal of the tech sector to create platforms and apps that are appropriate and age appropriate for young users," stated a leading online safety campaigner.

The United States: A State-by-State Approach

In the United States, action is largely unfolding at the state level against a backdrop of federal gridlock.

• The state of Utah mandates parental consent for minors to use social media and limits nighttime use.
• Florida has enacted a bill banning those below 14 from creating accounts on social media, though it is subject to legal challenges.
• The state of Virginia has approved a law limiting under-16s to one hour of social media use per day, with any further use needing parental permission.
• Georgia, Tennessee, and Louisiana have similarly enacted bills requiring adult authorization for teenagers to open social media presences.

Despite bipartisan support and calls from certain politicians to mimic this lead, a federal ban is currently seen as a distant prospect.

Worldwide Perspectives

Outside of the West, further nations are likewise considering moves.

• Malaysia intends to ban social media for teenagers starting from next year.
• Brazil has lifted the minimum age for Instagram to 16.

Yet, global bodies strike a more nuanced position. The UN children's agency has advised that blanket prohibitions pose dangers and "could have unintended consequences". The organization highlights that social networks can be a "critical link" for marginalized youth and that regulation should not be a "excuse" for social media firms to invest in child safeguards.

While this worldwide conversation unfolds, the actions of Australia and others show that governments globally are less and less prepared to wait for platforms to act voluntarily.